eXTReMe Tracker

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Booming Bubble Business

At some point, broadcasting companies did enough research -- or so they thought -- to feel justified in bringing news into your living rooms more often than at 6 and 11.

Morning shows were lengthened. The 6 o'clock news suddenly started to begin at 5, and in some markets 4. The noon show was created and then expanded. And some stations offer a 10 o'clock news instead of or in addition to their late news shows.

And oh yeah, those 24-hour cable news networks.

All this because our selfish, I-want-it-now culture demands it.

Don't get me wrong. Immediacy certainly has its perks, especially in TV and online news. You think anyone got the news about the Virginia Tech bloodbath by picking up this morning's paper? Me neither.

But such urgency also means more information travels faster, and to quote a network pretty from Monday afternoon, "Information is coming in, and some of it is accurate." Hooray!

Now that we've had almost a whole 24 hours of wall-to-wall on this awful tragedy, the experts feel it's time to chime in. Gun control reform, some scream, while others demand the firings of the university president and the police chief, among other high-ranking people.

This kills me.

When unthinkable crimes like mass shootings take place, it takes a while to turn numerous accounts from eyewitnesses and purported eyewitnesses into the confirmed facts of the case. On the surface, it does appear that the school suffered from a mild case of inaction.

But again, until the facts of the case are determined, don't so simply urge for the president to be immediately removed. What should he have done? Reach into his backpack for his trusty "Campus Mass-Shootings Survival Guide," and flip to page 72 for tips on handling such an occurrence?

Hmmm, says here that if he shoots up a dorm, in all likelihood he'll end up at the classroom building on the other side of the field. We'd better get some security over there.

Seriously, would a different university president have prevented this from happening?

Unfortunately, such tragedies are becoming all too common, but fortunately, not yet common enough that only a handful of colleges have had to endure them. It's still new to a lot of people, and there's no way a school president can be expected to protect 30,000 students at all times.

Maybe at freshman orientation, he can hand out bullet-proof bubbles to all incoming students so they can stay safe from future dangers.

Perhaps they can do that at all schools, or maybe at all sporting events across the globe, wherever tens of thousands of people are gathered in one location. I'm sure we'd end up commercializing our bullet-proof bubbles with monogramming and Louis Vuitton logos and so forth. It could be a booming bubble business!

I'd like to ramble more, but I've got some news to write. You've demanded it.

Labels: ,

2 Comments:

At 12:55 PM EDT, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bubble Boy,

Do you think lead anchors get off on news like this and if so do you think they feel guilty? Don't get me wrong I'm not saying they are hoping for tragedy but it seems like they are wired for this kind of news vs. the day-to-day hum-drum headlines. It seems like they perk up, they talk faster and their juices start flowing.

Have you ever felt this way and if so did you feel guilty afterwards or was it just part of performing at your highest? Like when you were working in Louisville reporting about ponies, horses and tiny men.

TFSD

 
At 1:14 PM EDT, Blogger Big Primpin' said...

Unfortunately, the big stories in news often are the tragic ones. Like you said, the anchors certainly don't wish for tragedy, but they're under a finer microscope when delivering such stories. There's more interest, viewership is up, and they're on air for longer periods of time.

When I first started in journalism, the object was to fill newspaper space. Some days you just didn't have enough stories, so you'd slap a "house ad" on it and poof, you're done.

But in television, there really aren't those kinds of house ads. Anchors have to stretch and stretch, and that causes them to ask the reporter out in the field ridiculous questions like, "Do you think they're still in shock?" just 24 hours after this shooting. I'd just gotten done laughing at that when I read your comment.

Lastly, I think you do perform differently when such a big news event takes place. In online news, where I am, maybe not so much because we're unfortunately not out in the field doing our own original reporting anymore. We're waiting for wire stories/images to cross, and then we hustle to get things posted, then check the competing sites to see if we beat them ... again.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home